العلوم الإنسانية تحت مرآة البنيوية

Abstract

the attempt of structural anthropology to study human and social sciences has been an important philosophical event since the middle of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century. this is what will attempt to prove in this essay by proving that the structuralism does not declare the birth of a new philosophy is a proof of the inability of some concepts of the curricula of the visual and natural sciences in the study of the field of human sciences. this encouraged the success of this in the field of language and linguistics, especially with de saussure, which revolutionized scientific language studies, so the structural study of human and social sciences come in response to the curricula of those sciences that distorted the nature of human sciences instead of raising the level to the level natural sciences, the basic task that the structural approach tried to reach, by calling, for concepts such as strict, objectivity, accuracy, heath , with the need to preserve the privacy of these sciences, namely that their phenomena come from awareness.