الخلاصة:
Abstract: I tried, on the basis of several sources and references, to contribute
a study about the personality of ʿAbd-al-Ḥaq al-Išbīlī Bejai, and was exposed at
first to the most important features of Išbīlī scientific and the most prominent of
its elders and disciples, and then touched on his writings the information
ر ا ة -
ج
- ا
- 10 ا د د ( 4 ) #"! 1442 /'ـ 2020 م
EISSN 2600-6324 ISSN 2170-1636 رد
https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/PresentationRevue/178
ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
203
achieved from them and the manuscript, and his abbreviations(mukhtaṣārat) in
Ḥadīth and genealogy, while raising the problem of the differences of the
annotations contained in the sources achieved and the manuscript. The
similarity of the names betweenʿAbd-al-Ḥaq al-Išbīlī and ʿAbd-al-Ḥaq al-sīkīllī,
who were confused, is problematic.
al-faqīh, al-moḤadīth and linguist of ʿAbd-al-Ḥaq al-Išbīlī was one of the
most famous Andalusian encyclopaediaes, forced by the internal circumstances
of Andalusia to return to Bidjāya, which was an incubator for expatriates from
all countries and an environment conducive to the adaptation of several arts, in
which Išbīlī composed most of his books in hadith, asceticism and language. He
was fond of al-Išbīlī, whose disciples circulated it, heard, narrated and
licensed, and formed a scientific network of scholars from various Islamic cities
that contributed to the publication of his writings and narrations among the
class of jurists and scholars, Maghreb and Machrek. The books of al-Aḥkām
(al-kubrá, al-wusṭá and aṣ-ṣuḡrā) and Āqibah were more circulating. In view of
the -1147scientific status of al-Išbīlī, were taken from him by jurists, almoḤadīthin, exegetists, and linguists in Maghreb and Machrek. It published
several works that helped researchers learn about his books, the information
and the lost.
Keywords:ʿAbd-al-Ḥaq al-Išbīlī ; Bidjāya ; al-Aḥkām ; Āqibah ; Maghreb ; Machrek
