عرض سجل المادة البسيط

dc.contributor.author Djemai, Foued
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-28T13:07:33Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-28T13:07:33Z
dc.date.issued 2018-12-30
dc.identifier.issn 1112-7279
dc.identifier.issn E 2676-1556
dc.identifier.uri http://ddeposit.univ-alger2.dz:8080/xmlui/handle/20.500.12387/6446
dc.description.abstract History, we are told, is discourse. There is no understanding it unless we understand the language in which people think, talk and take decisions. Among the historians tempted by what is called ‘the linguistic turn’ there are even some who argue that it is the ideas and concepts expressed in the words characteristic of the period that explain what happened and why. We are saturated with what the philosopher Thomas Hobbes called ‘insignificant speech’ (speech which means nothing) and its sub varieties ‘euphemism’ and George Orwell’s ‘newspeak’-namely speech deliberately intended to mislead by misdescription. But unless the facts themselves change, no amount of changing names/words changes them. ar_AR
dc.language.iso en ar_AR
dc.relation.ispartofseries Lettres et Langues. Al Adab Wa Llughat;Vol.13, Nr. 2
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject Discourse ar_AR
dc.subject Euphemism ar_AR
dc.subject Linguistic ar_AR
dc.subject Languages ar_AR
dc.subject Words ar_AR
dc.title Why American Hegemony Differs From Britain’s Empire ar_AR
dc.type Article ar_AR


الملفات في هذه المادة

ملفات الرخصة التالية مرتبطة بهذه المادة:

هذه المادة تظهر في الحاويات التالية

عرض سجل المادة البسيط

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States

بحث دي سبيس


بحث متقدم

استعرض

حسابي