Dépôt Institutionnel Numérique de la production Scientifique et Académique de l'Université d'Alger 2

كيف يتم الاسترشاد بفكرة الباراديغم العلمي في مجال الفكر الفلسفي العربي المعاصر؟

Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.author جاري, جويدة
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-28T18:08:36Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-28T18:08:36Z
dc.date.issued 2017-10-23
dc.identifier.issn 2170-1431
dc.identifier.issn EISSN: 2170-144X
dc.identifier.uri http://ddeposit.univ-alger2.dz:8080/xmlui/handle/20.500.12387/6473
dc.description.abstract ملخص: نتطرق في هذا المقال إلى إشكالية البراديغم في الفكر الفلسفي العربي المعاصر بغاية معرفة ما إذا كنا يمكن تطبيقه في هذا المجال مركزين في الوقن نفسه على بعض المشارع العربية النهصوية بدءا من الجيل الأول وهو جيل الإصلاح مرورا بالجيل الثاني وصولا إلى أقطاب الفكر العربي المعاصر والوقوف عند أهم الصعوبات التي تحول دون تطبيق هذا الباراديغم محاولين في الوقت نفسه الوقوف عند البراديغم في مجال العلم من خلال نظرية توماس كون للوصول في أخر التحليل إلى نتيجة مفادها أنه يمكن الاسترشاد بالبارايغم العلمي في مجال الفكر العربي المعاصر. Abstract: The availability of the research material in any work is a prerequisite for its achievement and the traveler in our Arab libraries faces a difficult momentum of research, studies and dissertations that have dealt with various problems in the field of contemporary Arab philosophical thought, but all are rooted in the crucible of modernity, originality, contemporarism, progress and backwardness. We find a study or dissertation that is concerned with the Paradigm problem, whether in the scientific field Paradigme or the contemporary Arab philosophical field. But the concept of paradigms as a philosophical scientific term is completely absent in in our intellectual Arab philosophical space. Our lack of such a mentor in the theoretical research and the reasons for his absence in contemporary Arabic philosophical studies was one of the most important concerns and intellectual concerns that prompted us to write this article to dig in its corridors through philosophical trends dominated by heterogeneity in subtraction and reflection. For this reason, the focus of the research and the focus on how and how to use the idea of paradigms as suggested by Thomas Kuhn, we mean the metaphysical meaning, the social meaning, and the artificial meaning in the history of science, to guide and employ it in the field of philosophical thought based on the three meanings of the Paradigm concept: Can the idea of paradigms be guided in the field of contemporary Arab philosophical thought? How can we move the idea from science to employ it in philosophy? If we recognize the existence of paradigms in contemporary Arab philosophical thought, is it a frame of reference or is it in the framework of composition? What are the paradigms identified by the problem of Renaissance in its historical course? Why has the proposed projects in the context of contemporary Arab philosophical thought failed to achieve the Renaissance ? Is it due to the absence of paradigms (model) based on scientific and objective basis? Résumé in our intellectual Arab philosophical space. Our lack of such a mentor in the theoretical research and the reasons for his absence in contemporary Arabic philosophical studies was one of the most important concerns and intellectual concerns that prompted us to write this article to dig in its corridors through philosophical trends dominated by heterogeneity in subtraction and reflection. For this reason, the focus of the research and the focus on how and how to use the idea of paradigms as suggested by Thomas Kuhn, we mean the metaphysical meaning, the social meaning, and the artificial meaning in the history of science, to guide and employ it in the field of philosophical thought based on the three meanings of the Paradigm concept: Can the idea of paradigms be guided in the field of contemporary Arab philosophical thought? How can we move the idea from science to employ it in philosophy? If we recognize the existence of paradigms in contemporary Arab philosophical thought, is it a frame of reference or is it in the framework of composition? What are the paradigms identified by the problem of Renaissance in its historical course? Why has the proposed projects in the context of contemporary Arab philosophical thought failed to achieve the Renaissance ? Is it due to the absence of paradigms (model) based on scientific and objective basis? Keywords: paradigm; standard paradigm; system; project; renaissance; modernism; model. Résumé: Le fonds documentaire arabe est riche en œuvres scientifiques se rapportant aux thématiques philosophiques d’authenticité, de modernité, de progrès et de sous développement. Mais il est pauvre en écrits sur la question paradigme aussi bien dans le domaine scientifique qu’en production philosophique. Ce terme est pratiquement absent dans la production philosophique arabe ce qui nous pousse à approfondir l’étude l’idée de ce sujet identifier les pistes permettant d’utiliser cet outil tel qu’il est défini par Thomas Kuhn, c’est-à-dire dans ses sens métaphasique, social et artificiel et ce dans le but de faire avancer la pensée philosophique arabe contemporaine . ar_AR
dc.language.iso Ar ar_AR
dc.publisher مجلة "أفكار وآفاق".جامعة الجزائر 2 أبو القاسم سعد الله ar_AR
dc.relation.ispartofseries مجلة أفكار وآفاق;العدد 8
dc.subject الباراديعم ؛ الباراديغم القياسي؛ السيستام ؛ المشروع ؛ النهضة ؛ الحداثة ؛ النموذج. paradigm; standard paradigm; system; project; renaissance; modernism; model. paradigme, pensée philosophique, modernité. ar_AR
dc.title كيف يتم الاسترشاد بفكرة الباراديغم العلمي في مجال الفكر الفلسفي العربي المعاصر؟ ar_AR
dc.type Article ar_AR


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Chercher dans le dépôt


Recherche avancée

Parcourir

Mon compte