Afficher la notice abrégée
dc.contributor.author |
جاري, جويدة
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-05-28T18:08:36Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-05-28T18:08:36Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017-10-23 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2170-1431 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
EISSN: 2170-144X |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://ddeposit.univ-alger2.dz:8080/xmlui/handle/20.500.12387/6473 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
ملخص: نتطرق في هذا المقال إلى إشكالية البراديغم في الفكر الفلسفي العربي المعاصر بغاية معرفة ما إذا كنا يمكن تطبيقه في هذا المجال مركزين في الوقن نفسه على بعض المشارع العربية النهصوية بدءا من الجيل الأول وهو جيل الإصلاح مرورا بالجيل الثاني وصولا إلى أقطاب الفكر العربي المعاصر والوقوف عند أهم الصعوبات التي تحول دون تطبيق هذا الباراديغم محاولين في الوقت نفسه الوقوف عند البراديغم في مجال العلم من خلال نظرية توماس كون للوصول في أخر التحليل إلى نتيجة مفادها أنه يمكن الاسترشاد بالبارايغم العلمي في مجال الفكر العربي المعاصر.
Abstract: The availability of the research material in any work is a prerequisite for its achievement and the traveler in our Arab libraries faces a difficult momentum of research, studies and dissertations that have dealt with various problems in the field of contemporary Arab philosophical thought, but all are rooted in the crucible of modernity, originality, contemporarism, progress and backwardness. We find a study or dissertation that is concerned with the Paradigm problem, whether in the scientific field Paradigme or the contemporary Arab philosophical field. But the concept of paradigms as a philosophical scientific term is completely absent in in our intellectual Arab philosophical space. Our lack of such a mentor in the theoretical research and the reasons for his absence in contemporary Arabic philosophical studies was one of the most important concerns and intellectual concerns that prompted us to write this article to dig in its corridors through philosophical trends dominated by heterogeneity in subtraction and reflection. For this reason, the focus of the research and the focus on how and how to use the idea of paradigms as suggested by Thomas Kuhn, we mean the metaphysical meaning, the social meaning, and the artificial meaning in the history of science, to guide and employ it in the field of philosophical thought based on the three meanings of the Paradigm concept: Can the idea of paradigms be guided in the field of contemporary Arab philosophical thought? How can we move the idea from science to employ it in philosophy? If we recognize the existence of paradigms in contemporary Arab philosophical thought, is it a frame of reference or is it in the framework of composition? What are the paradigms identified by the problem of Renaissance in its historical course? Why has the proposed projects in the context of contemporary Arab philosophical thought failed to achieve the Renaissance ? Is it due to the absence of paradigms (model) based on scientific and objective basis?
Résumé
in our intellectual Arab philosophical
space. Our lack of such a mentor in the
theoretical research and the reasons for
his absence in contemporary Arabic
philosophical studies was one of the most
important concerns and intellectual concerns that prompted us to write this article
to dig in its corridors through philosophical trends dominated by heterogeneity in
subtraction and reflection. For this reason, the focus of the research and the
focus on how and how to use the idea of
paradigms as suggested by Thomas
Kuhn, we mean the metaphysical meaning, the social meaning, and the artificial
meaning in the history of science, to
guide and employ it in the field of philosophical thought based on the three
meanings of the Paradigm concept: Can
the idea of paradigms be guided in the
field of contemporary Arab philosophical
thought? How can we move the idea from
science to employ it in philosophy?
If we recognize the existence of paradigms in contemporary Arab philosophical thought, is it a frame of
reference or is it in the framework of
composition?
What are the paradigms identified by
the problem of Renaissance in its historical course?
Why has the proposed projects in the
context of contemporary Arab philosophical thought failed to achieve the
Renaissance ? Is it due to the absence
of paradigms (model) based on scientific and objective basis?
Keywords: paradigm; standard paradigm; system; project; renaissance; modernism; model.
Résumé: Le fonds documentaire arabe est riche
en œuvres scientifiques se rapportant
aux thématiques philosophiques d’authenticité, de modernité, de progrès et de
sous développement. Mais il est pauvre
en écrits sur la question paradigme aussi
bien dans le domaine scientifique qu’en
production philosophique. Ce terme est
pratiquement absent dans la production
philosophique arabe ce qui nous pousse
à approfondir l’étude l’idée de ce sujet
identifier les pistes permettant d’utiliser
cet outil tel qu’il est défini par Thomas
Kuhn, c’est-à-dire dans ses sens métaphasique, social et artificiel et ce dans le
but de faire avancer la pensée philosophique arabe contemporaine . |
ar_AR |
dc.language.iso |
Ar |
ar_AR |
dc.publisher |
مجلة "أفكار وآفاق".جامعة الجزائر 2 أبو القاسم سعد الله |
ar_AR |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
مجلة أفكار وآفاق;العدد 8 |
|
dc.subject |
الباراديعم ؛ الباراديغم القياسي؛ السيستام ؛ المشروع ؛ النهضة ؛ الحداثة ؛ النموذج. paradigm; standard paradigm; system; project; renaissance; modernism; model. paradigme, pensée philosophique, modernité. |
ar_AR |
dc.title |
كيف يتم الاسترشاد بفكرة الباراديغم العلمي في مجال الفكر الفلسفي العربي المعاصر؟ |
ar_AR |
dc.type |
Article |
ar_AR |
Fichier(s) constituant ce document
Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)
Afficher la notice abrégée